Sep 9

Today I had a stark realisation: I no longer depend on Google to find stuff. I still use it to locate things: e.g. “find me the Wikipedia page on Ted Kennedy’s acquatic activities”. But I rarely - if ever - use it to find businesses, places to visit, interesting blogs, etc.

The difference between finding something and locating something might seem mere semantics, but it is essential to this discussion. When you’re trying to find something you don’t know exactly what you’re looking for - you are searching in some general direction. When you’re trying to locate something, you know exactly what you’re looking for and you just need help getting to it.

As an example: let’s say I’m at work trying to find a tool to make it easier to track social media conversations. A few years ago I would have Googled “social media tracking” and checked out each site on the first page of results. Today I wouldn’t even bother Googling it. I’d remember that someone I vaguely know told me about a product called Radian6 at a party a few months ago. I would check that out. I’d go find the Forrester report on social media conversation tracking products and see what they recommend. I’d ask some people at media agencies and they’d recommend Nielsen BuzzMetrics. I’d send an email to our colleagues at sister WPP company Ogilvy PR 360 Digital Influence and ask them what they use. I’d ask my Twitter followers if they have any recommendations.

Or let’s take another example. I wake up on a Sunday morning in my home suburb of Fitzroy. I’m hungry and I want to find somewhere new to have breakfast. Not too long ago I would have started my search on Google with “fitzroy cafe melbourne”. Now - not a chance. In the back of my mind I have a collection of local cafes that people have told me about, some good and some bad. I might check with The Age’s “Cheap Eats” guide. I’d definitely check out The Breakfast Blog. I might do a Twitter search or see what the people I follow on Twitter who live nearby are saying about their breakfast escapades.

Why the change?

There are three reasons for this significant behavioural change:

Firstly, social networks have dramatically expanded my network of contacts (or “social graph” as Razorfish calls it). There are people I have never met in real life who I talk with more on Twitter or Tumblr than friends who live in Melbourne. We share similar interests and have developed ‘trust’. When we make recommendations - whether implicitly or explicity - they have meaning.

This is the fundamental problem with Google search: there is no trust. Once upon a time we could trust that the best products would be at the top of Google’s search results for any given term. This is no longer true. In fact we should be especially skeptical of those who come up first in Google results - as they are more than likely to be the ones whose products suck and are gaming the system.

Which leads to my second reason - search engine optimisation (SEO) experts have killed their own game. To test this theory I just Googled “social media tracking” and “fitzroy melbourne cafe”. Neither search yielded useful results. The SEO industry has transformed from “help Google index my site better” to “how can I beat Google’s relevance algorithms to show people results they don’t want”. There was a time when Google was really good at showing the most useful results, I think that this time has passed.

Heavily SEOed aggregators are a big part of this problem. My search for “fitzroy melbourne cafe” returns a whole list of badly designed, hard to use ‘portals’. It’s impossible to know whether they are impartial brokers of information or just paid shills for the local businesses who can’t get by on word of mouth and are forced to advertise. Mostly they are just a complete waste of time. The aforementioned Breakfast Blog creates 100x more value for its users than any of these sites.

As an aside - the PR geniuses who constantly get up to dishonest tricks online are also killing their own game. They create blogs and write favourable posts about the brands and products they’re trying to sell, or they pay bloggers to write favourable posts. As a result I now only trust a handful of blogs - those that are recommended by people I know or that have built up a strong reputation and following.

Thirdly - the flow of information has changed. In times past, I was always seeking out information through Google search. Now the vast majority of the information I am interested in comes to me, rather than me having to go out and find it. Social networks such as Twitter and Tumblr are excellent examples of this. By choosing who to follow, each individual can create their own ideal flow of information that contains exactly what they are interested in.

Another great example of this is RSS - when I woke up this morning I had 850 items unread in my RSS reader. It took me an hour to get through them, but I absorbed a huge amount of information while doing this. Each post I read broadened my knowledge of various markets, ideas, and issues. I will collect this information and use it to make decisions and recommendations in the future.

This shift in information flow has fundamentally changed the way I think about products. If I haven’t heard of a business then as far as I’m concerned it doesn’t exist. I don’t care if it ranks #1 in Google. The only way to get noticed is to become part of my information flow. This means brands and products need to be awesome enough to be noticed by those from whom I collect the information.

What does this mean?

Just so we are absolutely clear - I am not predicting the death of Google, but the way people use it will continue to change. Search engines in various forms have been at the center of the internet’s information flows since the very early days, but social networks are starting to challenge this dominance. Perhaps the browser homepage of the future will be a “social search engine” that combines your social graph with traditional search.

This has big implications for brands: if your brand is not social then it doesn’t exist. Obviously this applies less to companies like Nike and Coca Cola who spend billions of dollars on advertising every year to make their brands visible. But their game has already become much more difficult and expensive as media becomes far more fragmented. One thing is for sure - it’s only going to get harder.

Filed under:

 
  • Print
  • Comments (8)
Gordon
DTDigital 11 Sep 2009

Twitter, etc. are very cool, but Google is so fantastic, it's easy to take it for granted, like fresh air. I live on Google. It never ceases to amaze me how useful it is. I used to think stuff like, "I wish I could find out what that pole thing at the end of a soccer field is called." Now I just go to Google and type in "Cahill punches". Done. The answer is there, and I can watch a vid of Timmy punching the "corner post" at Stoke. A bit of Google backlash is to be expected. Here in Australia, where Google has nearly 90% of the search market, it rules like the Old Testament's Big Guy -- mercifully, secretly and all powerfully, with plenty of cash to build the finest pearly gates. Of course, search is not a monotheistic religion, and Google could go the way of Zeus. Right now I'm really liking Microsoft's Bing. The homepage is beautiful and interesting. It's full of the "StumbleUpon" pleasures that make the internet great. Bing's search results also have a cool feature that lets you read more than a "snippet" of sample page text. So I have Google in my Firefox search window and Bing as my home. I think it's healthy to encourage competition in search design and innovation, even if using a Microsoft product is a strange way of cheering for the underdog. Of course, if Twitter really can make search better, it won't be long before I make the switch. But for now Google or Bing are a long way ahead of the not-so-encyclopedic knowledge of my trusted Tweeting friends.

Benedict
BRM Web Consulting 11 Sep 2009

I agree fully about Google. Increasingly I have found that businesses at the top of the list are not trustworthy (to me at least) and are there from misguided SEO and not relevance. The technology open a new era and we sent it back to the middle ages out of stupid selfishness. "Meet the new boss, same as the old boss" - The Who - Won't Get Fooled Again. :-)

Amber Naslund
Radian6 16 Sep 2009

Alex, I love your distinction between locating something and finding it. When I reflect on it, I do much the same thing - discover things through recommendations from friends or trusted associates, but dig for the details on Google when I know what I'm looking for. I'm sure, though, that folks not as socially plugged in might not do it the same way. It's an interesting realization of how the notions of trust and qualified, vetted opinions are changing the way individual consumers do business. Thanks for the post, and the shoutout. Best, Amber Naslund Director of Community, Radian6 @ambercadabra

joel
16 Sep 2009

Good points! And getting into the Social stream is not so hard these days.

Gordon
DTDigital 17 Sep 2009

Here's something that supports Alex's post: A recent Harris Interactive poll reveals it takes people an average of six search queries to arrive at their intended destination and even then 50 per cent of us remain disappointed by the experience. From: http://www.theage.com.au/technology/biz-tech/bing-sparks-search-war-20090909-fg6l.html

Alex Campbell
DTDigital 17 Sep 2009

Gordon, Benedict, Amber & Joel - thanks for the great comments!

I certainly agree with Gordon that Google is still incredibly useful and relevant overall. My observation is just that the SEO people are continuously making it harder for Google to return great results, and at the same time people are finding new ways to use their networks to find what they need.

Nik
4 Nov 2009

While there is definite comfort in relying on the information of a trusted party, there is still the searching for something new - and i would say that google has a head start on that space with the google maps application on iphone (and probably droid as well) - try entering cafe or alcohol into the search and it lists everything related that is geographically close to you. I often end up finding something new nearby that i never knew about.

Alex Campbell
DTDigital 5 Nov 2009

Hey Nik, thanks for the comment!

I agree that making search location-aware adds a whole new dimension. I love the idea of using Google Maps on iPhone to discover new places to go and things to do - I'll have to give that a try!

Return to our Insight blog